Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, said the opinion was a win for workers. “That, obviously, would be a violation of the disability discrimination laws.”ĭavid Lopez, a co-dean of the Rutgers University Law School and the former general counsel of the U.S. I’m terminating them because I really don’t like wheelchairs,’” Link said. “If we imagine a situation where an employer says, ‘Oh, I’m not terminating them because they’re paralyzed. Link said courts are acknowledging the difficulty of separating a person’s disability from her treatment plan. “Just as the Compassionate Use Act imposes no burden on defendants, it negates no rights or claims available to plaintiff that emanate from the ,” the opinion reads. ![]() ![]() WHYY thanks our sponsors - become a WHYY sponsorĪlthough the state’s medical marijuana law doesn’t require employers to accommodate workers who use the prescribed drug, the appellate court found the state’s law against discrimination may still protect them.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |